<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A few notes on iPhoto print service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macdiggs.com/2009/03/30/a-few-notes-on-iphoto-print-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macdiggs.com/2009/03/30/a-few-notes-on-iphoto-print-service/</link>
	<description>Digging the watery grave and talking about PHP, Rails and tech stuff..</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 11:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: simpsons-fans.ru</title>
		<link>http://macdiggs.com/2009/03/30/a-few-notes-on-iphoto-print-service/comment-page-1/#comment-27977</link>
		<dc:creator>simpsons-fans.ru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 13:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdiggs.com/?p=595#comment-27977</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;simpsons-fans.ru...&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;a href='http://simpsons-fans.ru' rel="nofollow"&gt;Имею&lt;/a&gt; возможность поделиться &lt;a href='http://dalnoboishiky.ru' rel="nofollow"&gt;практическим&lt;/a&gt; опытом в &lt;a href='http://joomla-club.ru' rel="nofollow"&gt;описанной&lt;/a&gt; проб...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>simpsons-fans.ru&#8230;</strong></p>
<p><a href='http://simpsons-fans.ru' rel="nofollow">Имею</a> возможность поделиться <a href='http://dalnoboishiky.ru' rel="nofollow">практическим</a> опытом в <a href='http://joomla-club.ru' rel="nofollow">описанной</a> проб&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gmill</title>
		<link>http://macdiggs.com/2009/03/30/a-few-notes-on-iphoto-print-service/comment-page-1/#comment-27829</link>
		<dc:creator>gmill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdiggs.com/?p=595#comment-27829</guid>
		<description>So Apple has changed to Fuji for the photo prints?

This is terrible and why the quality is now terrible.

Why did Apple abandon Kodak printing?  That was the best now we have
to settle for FUJI crap?

I will never print through apple again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Apple has changed to Fuji for the photo prints?</p>
<p>This is terrible and why the quality is now terrible.</p>
<p>Why did Apple abandon Kodak printing?  That was the best now we have<br />
to settle for FUJI crap?</p>
<p>I will never print through apple again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Irwin</title>
		<link>http://macdiggs.com/2009/03/30/a-few-notes-on-iphoto-print-service/comment-page-1/#comment-27754</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Irwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdiggs.com/?p=595#comment-27754</guid>
		<description>I checked my aperture photos and it seems that my photos are not altered significantly in the photobook (Aperture book).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I checked my aperture photos and it seems that my photos are not altered significantly in the photobook (Aperture book).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://macdiggs.com/2009/03/30/a-few-notes-on-iphoto-print-service/comment-page-1/#comment-27752</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 03:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdiggs.com/?p=595#comment-27752</guid>
		<description>OK so I have called Apple support line, and it SEEMS that Aperture photos are treated a little bit different than iPhoto ones. The guy on the other side was speaking too fast for me (they only have Japanese-language support..), but I think I got it.
So basically, the do some "optimizations" for Aperture-printed photos as well, but "not to a degree as iPhoto ones". Photos are being printed at the same factory though.. As for books, they are printed "abroad" (in the States) and then shipped to Japan, so there's yet another processing option involved..
So I guess I just won't be trying my luck anymore, get on my car and drive 5 mins to a local print service, tell them to just print photos as they are and be good :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK so I have called Apple support line, and it SEEMS that Aperture photos are treated a little bit different than iPhoto ones. The guy on the other side was speaking too fast for me (they only have Japanese-language support..), but I think I got it.<br />
So basically, the do some &#034;optimizations&#034; for Aperture-printed photos as well, but &#034;not to a degree as iPhoto ones&#034;. Photos are being printed at the same factory though.. As for books, they are printed &#034;abroad&#034; (in the States) and then shipped to Japan, so there&#039;s yet another processing option involved..<br />
So I guess I just won&#039;t be trying my luck anymore, get on my car and drive 5 mins to a local print service, tell them to just print photos as they are and be good :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://macdiggs.com/2009/03/30/a-few-notes-on-iphoto-print-service/comment-page-1/#comment-27751</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 03:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdiggs.com/?p=595#comment-27751</guid>
		<description>Andrew,

yeah, they told me they just print all the photos using the same automated process. You can't opt-out (as in, please print as it is), and I was told by Apple iPhoto support guy that all future photos will be autocorrected as well.. So I guess I'm SOL in its purest form.. :)

Guess I should try printing from Aperture as well.. But I'd better call Apple and confirm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew,</p>
<p>yeah, they told me they just print all the photos using the same automated process. You can&#039;t opt-out (as in, please print as it is), and I was told by Apple iPhoto support guy that all future photos will be autocorrected as well.. So I guess I&#039;m SOL in its purest form.. :)</p>
<p>Guess I should try printing from Aperture as well.. But I&#039;d better call Apple and confirm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://macdiggs.com/2009/03/30/a-few-notes-on-iphoto-print-service/comment-page-1/#comment-27750</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 03:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdiggs.com/?p=595#comment-27750</guid>
		<description>Good to know I am not the only one who had this happen. I had the same problem. Did Apple confirm that they auto corrected the photo? Also I too am wondering if aperture would be different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to know I am not the only one who had this happen. I had the same problem. Did Apple confirm that they auto corrected the photo? Also I too am wondering if aperture would be different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://macdiggs.com/2009/03/30/a-few-notes-on-iphoto-print-service/comment-page-1/#comment-27742</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdiggs.com/?p=595#comment-27742</guid>
		<description>Hm.. Actually, printing from Aperture might just work! I should call Apple support and check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm.. Actually, printing from Aperture might just work! I should call Apple support and check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Irwin</title>
		<link>http://macdiggs.com/2009/03/30/a-few-notes-on-iphoto-print-service/comment-page-1/#comment-27741</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Irwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdiggs.com/?p=595#comment-27741</guid>
		<description>It's a shame. I have a great book printed from within aperture and it looks fantastic.

It's a pity they "corrected" this. I wonder if it happens across the board. Maybe it's different between prints and books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s a shame. I have a great book printed from within aperture and it looks fantastic.</p>
<p>It&#039;s a pity they &#034;corrected&#034; this. I wonder if it happens across the board. Maybe it&#039;s different between prints and books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

